On June 20, 2016 the VSB released a list of 12 schools which it is considering for closure: 4 annexes, 6 elementary and 2 secondary schools, all but one on the eastside.
PAN recognized the occasion by mourning the over 240 schools across BC which have been forced to close over the past 15 years.
Media coverage includes:
June 19, 2016
To VBE Trustees,
RE: School closure list and repurposing policy
We are writing to express our grave concerns with respect to the school closure list to be
announced on Monday, June 20th. We understand that this list is intended to expedite a
large number of school closures (perhaps as many as 15-18) within the next two years.
Since this course of action appears to deviate from the timeline articulated within the
consultation process, and the impact of school closures will be felt most acutely by
families, we ask that you thoughtfully consider the perspective of parents.
We accept the necessity of repurposing (closing) a number of schools as swing sites for
moving the SMP forward and ultimately to reduce surplus capacity where current and
future catchment populations are truly in decline and are unable to sustain a
neighbourhood school. However, we continue to oppose the degree of closures being
forced under the 95% utilization targets set by the provincial government as a condition
for seismic upgrading. This capacity target, which is not based on educational research
or priorities, will severely limit the VSB's ability to provide appropriate learning
environments for all children, and we feel particular concern for special needs programs,
tier 1 & 2 schools, and the loss of spaces for core educational purposes such as the arts.
Now it seems that "affordability measures" are not only forcing this capacity utilization,
but accelerating school closures in advance of the timeline originally put forward in the
approved LRFP (14 years). We are deeply concerned that the drive to reduce
expenditures in the short term is expediting school closures much faster than would be
otherwise advisable, and that there will be repercussions for this action that will certainly
outweigh some of the short term financial gains.
We know from research that school closures will have profound impacts on children and
communities, with disproportionate trauma felt by vulnerable populations for whom
schools are the primary source of stability and family support (not just services, but also
the relational networks which are a life line for many). Though these impacts may not
register as itemized ‘cuts’ on a spreadsheet, for many, they will be no less devastating.
Vulnerability is more pervasive than it may appear — 22% of children in Vancouver
(approximately 11,000 children within the VSB) live in poverty. We are concerned that
the VSB has not had sufficient time to gather a 'deep inventory’ of schools to protect
these communities for which proximity and community stability are critical.
An expedited timeframe and the simultaneous displacement of thousands of children will
severely limit the ability of the VSB to adequately support affected families and school
communities through this upheaval. Furthermore, fast tracking closures rather than
working through the SMP timeframe, will mean that many children will be twice
dislocated – first through closure and then for seismic upgrades. This is a heavy toll to
place on children and families.
The LRFP public consultation built up a great deal of trust with the public particularly
around trade-offs that would offset the loss of a neighbourhood school (which is an
anchor within a community), with alternate services that would enhance community life.
Leasing a vacated school site on publicly reserved land with a playground paid for by
parent/PAC funds, to independent/private schools would be a source of tremendous
outrage for parents. This point is categorically stated within the LRFP Public
Consultation Report. It is crucial that the VSB honour its commitment to affected
communities in the appropriate and timely repurposing of vacated sites, consistent with
the priorities identified by the public within that consultation process. A compressed
timeframe of mass closures would make this extremely challenging.
An expedited process would also diminish the district's ability to develop and advocate
for creative proposals that could reduce surplus capacity while mitigating the overall
number of school closures. Unlike other districts, the VSB has the potential for
generating revenue through mixed use vertical schools (commonplace in Toronto, New
York and other major urban centres), community focused partnership leases (or partial
repurposing) with other service providers (ECE for example) or the partial sale of land to
offset rightsizing costs. This would preserve the value of neighbourhood schools, and
provide long term revenue sources, while allowing the VSB to continue to design schools
for 21st century learning needs. An expedited process of school closure removes any
ability to pressure the provincial government to entertain proposals outside of a “stuff
and close”, “lowest-cost” seismic procedure, rendering any advocacy to this end moot.
Finally, expediting a large number of closures would severely limit the VSB’s ability to
respond to changing demographics over the next 14 years (the actual SMP timeframe).
A high degree of choice mobility has already been identified as a factor in “under
enrolled” schools and, unless the district wishes to engage in a widespread forced
expulsion of children, it will take many years to restore balance. In addition, the
increasing volatility of the housing market in Vancouver, and the forced migration of
families east, will likely change the demographic landscape of this city markedly, even
within this timeframe.
We believe that there is an inevitability to this closure list that is different than the last
time. Simply naming these schools will set in motion a chain reaction of decisions that
will begin the decimation of school communities, making the subsequent retraction of
any school from the closure list nearly impossible. Osoyoos being a case in point.
Therefore, we strongly urge the Vancouver Board of Trustees to slow down this process
and limit the public declaration of schools for expedited closure to swing sites (and nonenrolled
schools) as originally intended. This will allow the VSB the flexibility it needs to
work within the original timeline of the LRFP, to honour the feedback of the public
consultation process, to protect the well-being of communities and provide the best
educational environments for the children of our city today and the future.
The Parent Advocacy Network for Public Education
Over 200 schools have been closed in British Columbia over the last fifteen years. Up to 20 more will be announced in Vancouver alone on Monday. Though sometimes it does make sense for a district to close a school, other times closures are forced upon a district by chronic provincial underfunding and an Education Ministry's refusal to provide predictable, stable resources for districts.
Schools are far more than just buildings. They're central to every community they occupy. To treat them as mere vessels of statistics and arbitrary utilization rates is an insult to all the children, teachers, administrators, staff, parents, and community residents whose lives are touched by them.
Join us 6:40pm Monday June 20th outside the VSB School Board (10th & Fir) to mourn the loss of all the schools that have been shuttered across our province, and to stand by the Vancouver School Board Trustees who have been fiercely advocating to keep our district's public education system healthy and thriving.
Facebook event page
Presentation by PAN member Maggie Milne Martens
on June 7, 2016 at the VSB Committee of the Whole
I am speaking on behalf of the Parent Advocacy Network for Public Education.
Here we are again and I thank you for the opportunity to speak to you tonight about the revised budget, but - like you - I am weary and frustrated that we are once more participating in this fraught and distressing process in which parents, teachers and school boards alike are forced to vie for essential educational services for children - just because the provincial government has decided to throw a few crumbs from the table - and they are crumbs. This whole process is symptomatic of an education system in deep crisis.
We are not here to debate amendments. We are here to urge you once again to reject this budget.
The restoration of 2.25 million dollars, while certainly welcome, does nothing to address the root cause of the budget shortfall - which is a flawed and inadequate provincial funding system - one that is totally insufficient to meet the educational needs of all children. Nor does this mitigate the impacts of the staggering $21.8 million in cuts that remain, all of which will have significant, detrimental and long lasting repercussions for ALL children across this entire district. The relentless austerity measures imposed by the government have gone too far and threatens the whole democratic purpose of our public education system.
Meager concessions by the provincial government change nothing. BC Ed is still in the red. The parent advocacy network therefore urges you, the board of trustees to stand firm - and united - in your resolve to reject this budget - as an act of protest against the continued underfunding and dismantling of our public education system. Parents, teachers, concerned citizens of this city and school boards across the province are looking to you - to once again lead by example and have the courage to take a stand for all children, for public education and for our future society.
Please say NO.
As you probably have heard, the Ministry of Education decided to return the $25 million in additional 'administrative savings' in its 2016 budget to the school districts to spend as they please. For Vancouver, this means $2.25 million will go back into its 2016/17 budget reducing the shortfalls from $24.05 million to $21.8 million.
As you are probably also aware, the previous budget did not pass on April 28th. Trustees Joy Alexander, Patti Bacchus, Janet Fraser, Mike Lombardi and Alan Wong voted no ... just like we asked them too, the cuts were too severe and would negatively impact all children, especially the more vulnerable. The cuts are still being implemented by the superintendent as he is required to do. He is now implementing the newly revised budget proposal.
TONIGHT, there is going to be a Committee of the Whole/Special Board Meeting starting at 5pm. This is another opportunity to tell the trustees what we want them to do, and to show the government that we're paying attention and believe education is a top priority.
Will this release of funds by the government be enough to make our 'noise' go away or are there still too many cuts to our children's classroom and support systems? If this revised budget, with $21.8 million in cuts, was presented on March 31 would we still would have said NO, enough is enough and this is too much? Find out tonight. PAN is planning to speak. Join us. Wear your RED. Bring your #BCEDINRED signs. Sign up to speak (sign up is on-site (VSB board office) starting at 4:30pm).
NOTE: At ANY board meeting this June, including the one tonight after the presentations, a trustee who voted NO on April 28th can put forth a motion to reconsider that vote. This means the trustees could again vote to amend, pass, or not pass, this revised 'balanced' budget (or a future one if the situation again changes) before June 30th.
PAN updates and news, partner events, and other timely information relating to public school advocacy in and around Vancouver, BC.